palmclaus6

Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History Asbestos-related lawsuits have led to the bankruptcies of a number of businesses. Bellflower asbestos attorneys will help you obtain compensation. Doctors and health experts long warned about asbestos exposure's dangers. But, some industry leaders minimized the risks. Over time, asbestos-related diseases became more prevalent. The Third Case Asbestos lawsuits began to take off in the 1970s after studies in science began to connect asbestos with serious diseases such as asbestosis or mesothelioma. Tens of thousands of lawsuits were filed because asbestos-related diseases do not usually manifest for years after exposure. These lawsuits were filed in Texas because of its favorable laws. One of the most important cases that shaped asbestos litigation involved Johns Manville, the leading producer of asbestos products in the 1940s and 1950s. In the 1980s, it was discovered that Lewis Brown, the CEO of the company, put profits above the safety and health of his employees. In his deposition, Brown admitted that he was heavily dependent on Dr. Russell Budd, the chief medical advisor to his company. Budd was an expert in his field who was known for his callous disregard of the health of workers. Johns Manville was found to be aware of asbestos' dangers, but did not take any steps to protect their workers. The court ruled that the company is accountable for any damages suffered by workers who later develop mesothelioma or any other asbestos-related illness. The court also decided that the company was liable for damages to the families of deceased workers. Following the decision in Borel many asbestos-related victims and their families demanded compensation from the companies that used this material. Unfortunately, the majority of claims were denied due to various reasons. Certain cases were allowed be heard and the courts drafted guidelines for handling asbestos-related lawsuits. In the 1990s, asbestos defendants still sought legal rulings to limit their liability. They wanted to argue that asbestos materials were not part of their product and therefore they should not be held liable for the injuries suffered by people who employed with asbestos. These claims were unsuccessful and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to recognize the “asbestos product” defense. State and federal laws protect the rights of a mesothelioma patient to seek compensation for their condition from the parties accountable in a particular case. However, insurance companies continue to defend these claims tooth and nail.